breatharian
i was reading some article online about 'breatharians' who believe in sustaining life with only 'life energy' found in air or 'living with light'.. i wasnt exactly shocked by thier faith in ONLY air (considering the things that people believe in these days) but by their insistence that it is doing no harm to the body. i, personally, dont understand how this is probable. Water occupies 65 to 85& of all mammal's body, the wet mass that it. humans are no exception. we are made up of around 70% fluid. it might be wrong to say that 70% is Water. specifically, these fluids can be blood, digestive fluids, metabolic water and other bodily fluids. there are even fluids in the ear to help in balance... given the overwhelming wealth of credible facts about the importance, how can some of us still be so blind. we might be able to survive for day a week without food. but without water? it only takes a few days... the supporters of Breatharian lifestyle maintains that the mind of the disciple needs to be ready for the change. they suggest a series of inductions that reduce the amount of food and water intake gradually. many who tried this 'programme' died due to liver damage or extreme dehydration. and yes, it hurts...
Jasmuheen, probably the most visible advocate for this lifestyle change even claimed that her DNA expanded 2 to 12 strands to adsord more hydrogen. This is impossible. scientifically, evolutionally, physiologically, biochemically and logically unattainable!... when challenged to a blood test to prove her 'evolution of genetic materials, she said that she didnt understand the significance... i am trying ti visualise her facial menifestation when she first heard that challenge... she knew that science dont lie (usually)... and that her claims will be trampled on the ground. worthless.
i'm am, consequentially, confronted with the reason for sustainance of a lie. or a claim... i suppose it is really true that a lie breds another in it's defense. for example, imagine the impact on Jasmuheen's media profile if she is ever caught eating or drinking. (i'm rather certain she does eat and drink, only in secrecy...)and so she continues to lie. about the DNA (and how can she see that her dna 'expanded' when if it is true?) and about cause of death for her 'followers'. she has to contantly find reasons to connect deaths to 'psycho-spiritual' reasons. she must know that these death are a physiological articulation of a non feastible lifestyle!
or does she.
is she really so entangled in her own world of make-believe that facts on longer have any influence on her? is she so trapped by her first ever claim that she is now fully submerged in her self-destruction? is she that naive?
or maybe she is doing it on purpose.
maybe this is all a attempt to receive some sord of media coverage.
ultimately, if she wants to believe, she has all the right to. but, i think she shouldnt avocate her belief if it has been shown, statistically, that there is no happy ending.
and so we consider what blinds us. what makes us so deaf to the realistic understanding of the world. maybe it is some kind of inner monster screaming for control. maybe it is a conscious, cognizant choice to be indulged in a world of fantasy. or maybe it is purely psychosis. very scary psychosis...

